Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 5:45 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:26 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
..curious. Been using them but am about to tool up for an M & T. Not sure of any down side. Opinions?

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:49 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7380
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I do.

I switched from dovetail to double m&t, to m&t glued extension, to butt joint glued extension. It's easy peasy, and I don't see any real benefit from the tenon. I see no upside.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:54 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Mar 11, 2008 12:28 pm
Posts: 383
First name: William
Last Name: Snyder
City: Brooklyn
State: NY
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I've done a butt joint on a couple. Only downside I see is that I'm a little more hesitant to go with a lower profile on the heel (even though I run a dowel through the heel regardless).


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 5:57 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 4:10 pm
Posts: 721
First name: Bob
Last Name: Gramann
City: Fredericksburg
State: VA
Zip/Postal Code: 22408
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I use a butt joint with a dowel and two inserts biting in the dowel. It seems to me that there’s more meat in the heel body than there is in a tenon.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 6:51 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 22, 2014 1:45 pm
Posts: 1484
First name: Michael
Last Name: Colbert
City: Anacortes
State: WA
Focus: Build
Larry,

I use a M&T for aesthetic reasons. I do a parallel side heel and like the heel to be very thin. In the case of the guitar in the photo, a 1/2". I don't see how I'd be able to accomplish this with a butt joint and inserts so I create the structure using a tenon.

Best, M


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:37 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Sun Feb 27, 2005 10:11 am
Posts: 2173
When I do a butt joint i use a dowel in the heel. seems rock solid to me...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 7:58 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Oct 28, 2018 3:40 pm
Posts: 500
First name: Ernest
Last Name: Kleinman
City: Guthrie
State: OK
Zip/Postal Code: 73044
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Butt joint with maple oak or birch dowel, I also use a spline joint using a mini biscuit joiner the biscuits are birch or beech M and T must be perfect ,watch robbie o brein/s youtube vid on m /t joint. there are others as well


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:03 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 3076
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I just finished two guitars, both with bolted butt joints and glued down fingerboard extensions. It is a great joint, but I did make the heel larger than I would if I used a M&T joint or a dovetail. There needs to be some meat for the bolts to grab onto.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:15 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Apr 25, 2010 4:46 pm
Posts: 527
First name: Mark
Last Name: McLean
City: Sydney
State: New South Wales
Zip/Postal Code: 2145
Country: Australia
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
A butt joint can work fine. Like everybody has said - you just need enough thickness in the heel to get the bolts secure. I like to combine it with a bolt-down fingerboard extension, basically using a version of this system from luthier's cool tools (my neck block is beefier than what is shown).
http://www.luthierscooltools.com/Tools.htm#Bolt-on


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Dec 29, 2018 10:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2257
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I have been using them. With a Tenon you can not only get the heel thinner but you can use a tighter radius in the transition to get your thumb in a Little Closer.

New username, same Pat Mac

_________________
Pat


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:17 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thank you very much for taking the time to post comments/replies. For some reason I thought a butt joint was inferior in some regard and see the downside if one wants a thinner heel but perhaps I'll just perfect the method I currently use and skip the M&T joint all together. I just don't want my inherent laziness to get in the way of a better guitar.. :D

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:22 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
I generally use a butt joint, but lately I have been "burying" the heel in the end block to provide a little more thickness for the inserts while maintaining a normally proportioned heel. Cutting the recess for the "Spanish" heel is a little bit tedious so I am thinking of going to a Gibson style heel. One other advantage of the buried heel is the neck angle can be easily adjusted come "reset" time, or if you are more adventurous, you can undercut the recess and allow the bolt and string tension to set the neck angle (loosening the bolt raises the action, tightening the bolt lowers it. It is a variation on Stauffer's adjustable neck design.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 10:58 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Jan 03, 2006 1:47 pm
Posts: 1624
Location: United States
First name: Larry
Last Name: Hawes
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Clay S. wrote:
I generally use a butt joint, but lately I have been "burying" the heel in the end block to provide a little more thickness for the inserts while maintaining a normally proportioned heel. Cutting the recess for the "Spanish" heel is a little bit tedious so I am thinking of going to a Gibson style heel. One other advantage of the buried heel is the neck angle can be easily adjusted come "reset" time, or if you are more adventurous, you can undercut the recess and allow the bolt and string tension to set the neck angle (loosening the bolt raises the action, tightening the bolt lowers it. It is a variation on Stauffer's adjustable neck design.


Curious how that 'mortise' type cut for the heel is made in to the end block? Seems it would have to be exact with no room for error? And no wrong angles on the heel? Maybe missing something...Taylor does similar no?

_________________
Thank You and Best To All


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 12:09 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1876
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
We have - I used a butted neck joint on the 7string archtop-to-oud conversion, and the three Style 42 instruments completed recently were of butted construction.

Pros are:

- Ability to shape the heel taper with a router template
- Little possibility of messing up the tenon alignment (because there is none!)
- Avoids some tricky flossing when there is little in the way of material outside the tenon on a tapered heel
- Avoids need to reinforce tenon to prevent bearing failure (but see below re: dowel)
- Initial fitting on a rounded neck area and tapered heel is a little easier

Cons are:

- Weaker construction unless the heel-to-shaft transition is lengthened OR cross-grain dowel added
- Dowel or other cross-grain insert preferred for reliable threaded insert insertion and retention
- Tenon provides quick/easy alignment for fitting checks

Certainly something to try both ways, then see which you prefer. After working with butted joint, the Cumpiano bolted tenon, and dovetailed joint, all seem within reach of a new builder, although the barrel bolt/KD socket head connector bolt Cumpiano joint seems to me to be the most tolerant of any misalignment.

_________________
For the times they are a changin'

- Bob Dylan


Last edited by Woodie G on Mon Dec 31, 2018 7:08 am, edited 3 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 12:17 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Tue May 13, 2008 10:44 am
Posts: 6256
Location: Virginia
Butt Joint and dowel for me too. Unless I am doing a heel like on Selmer guitars that is very thin then it's a bolt on M/T.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 12:56 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
Clay S. wrote:
I generally use a butt joint, but lately I have been "burying" the heel in the end block to provide a little more thickness for the inserts while maintaining a normally proportioned heel. Cutting the recess for the "Spanish" heel is a little bit tedious so I am thinking of going to a Gibson style heel. One other advantage of the buried heel is the neck angle can be easily adjusted come "reset" time, or if you are more adventurous, you can undercut the recess and allow the bolt and string tension to set the neck angle (loosening the bolt raises the action, tightening the bolt lowers it. It is a variation on Stauffer's adjustable neck design.


"Curious how that 'mortise' type cut for the heel is made in to the end block? Seems it would have to be exact with no room for error? And no wrong angles on the heel? Maybe missing something...Taylor does similar no?"

Yes cutting the mortise is a bit fiddly. The heel is made with "straight sides" until it clears the mortise, plus a little, then shaped as usual. There is some latitude for setting the neck angle, as adjustments can be done to the heel or the bottom of the mortise. I think an "ice cream cone heel" or Gibson style heel might be a bit easier.
Taylor has adapted features of Stauffer's Legnani model's adjustable neck, making it non-adjustable by adding shims and using simpler hardware.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2018 1:48 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2016 12:35 pm
Posts: 124
First name: Hans
Last Name: Mattes
City: Petaluma
State: CA
Zip/Postal Code: 94952
Country: United States
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
On the last couple of guitars, I've used a heel with straight sides butted to the headblock. I've cut the guitar sides so that the butt of the neck (reinforced by a vertical maple dowel) sits directly on the headblock, held by a single bolt. Coupled with a floating fretboard extension, this allows some design & build opportunities, though it does require a more substantial heel than a M&T build.

-- I can separate the issues of string action and string height over the soundboard by slightly slotting the bolt hole in the headblock.

-- By burying the neck butt by the thickness of the sides, I can use a "Taylor wedge" if needed. (So far, not needed.)

-- I can experiment with freeing the upper bout, as the fretboard is clear of the soundboard. (I dispense with a massive UTB by bracing the headblock against the tailblock or against the sides at the waist.)

When all the fitting and fiddling is done, I cut a heelcap for the neck that gives a clean finish.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Jan 01, 2019 12:48 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Mon Feb 13, 2012 8:49 pm
Posts: 1042
First name: peter
Last Name: havriluk
City: granby
State: ct
Zip/Postal Code: 06035
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Enthusiastic response from me about using the attachment array sold by Luthier's Cool Tools. Used the process on two guitars, and I intend to continue to use it. I much appreciate the stability of the neck/fingerboard in mating the neck to the body, and the ease of adjusting neck angle. I think the process takes the task from witchcraft to engineering.

_________________
Peter Havriluk


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 18 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 72 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com