Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 3:49 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:41 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat May 17, 2008 1:11 pm
Posts: 2373
Location: Spokane, Washington
First name: Pat
Last Name: Foster
Country: USA
Focus: Build
meddlingfool wrote:
I'm confused as to why you would remove and replace an overly tall bridge rather than sand an overly tall one to proper height.

I will add that strange things happen in a production environment that cannot be contained or explained. I spent a good deal of time trying to isolate what/where/who/when/how in regards to neck angle. I can say the rough fitters knew their job and did it precisely. Proper knowledge, skills, tools and jigs, and did their job properly. But the neck angle changed from rough to final fit, sometimes a lot. I tracked thousands s of guitar through every step of production, and wound up shrugging it off as a mystery. So it doesn't surprise me that they wound up with a multiple bridge height solution. It makes sense in that environment....


Do you suppose that could have been from finish prep or finish on the body? Neck angle change from .007 or .008" at the heel (admittedly quite a bit) could translate to about 1/32 change at the nut.

Remembering this on steel strings has me hesitant to building classicals with a neck joint. With the integral neck and neck block, I don't get those kinds of surprises, but there are downsides. I think Bruce Sexauer does a sort of hybrid on this SS, building face down on a workboard like classicals are often done.

_________________
formerly known around here as burbank
_________________

http://www.patfosterguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 2:46 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7380
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
That was my best guess, as well as a slight distortion in shape from being cooked in the UV ovens...


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:12 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 19, 2013 7:33 am
Posts: 1876
First name: Willard
Last Name: Guthrie
City: Cumberland
State: Maryland 21502
Zip/Postal Code: 21502
Country: United State
Focus: Repair
Status: Semi-pro
For something like a Taylor bridge, I would agree...already flat-topped, so not much risk with the minor wing reshape. For a more complex bridge with offset top radius and contoured front and back edges, there is a labor versus risk versus final outcome trade to be done. Is it worth the extra labor such that the work appears better than the original? It's also an opportunity to clean up errors in design and contours, and easier to get through saddle slots on Martin bridges milled to the required offset bass/treble numbers off the guitar (which is usually needed with a bridge thickness reduction).

I have to wonder how other quality manufacturers seem to get their necks on with so much greater consistency than Martin. From my point of view, and on a much smaller sample size, I never saw a reset or new neck at the six month mark settle to more than 0.020" off the target string height here. I recall several that I thought were high going out, only to see them settle to near-perfect height within a few months. A mystery indeed.

_________________
For the times they are a changin'

- Bob Dylan


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Thu Oct 28, 2021 3:29 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Wed Feb 20, 2008 7:15 pm
Posts: 7380
First name: Ed
Last Name: Bond
City: Vancouver
Country: Canada
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
Oh the irony!

I just got a call from Sacramento from a luthier asking for best practice for resetting my necks. So that's at least two of three hundred that do, but shouldn't, need a reset. Scritch scritch.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 29, 2021 12:22 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2257
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Conor_Searl wrote:
Do you find that your average customer can also play a guitar with super low action without making the thing buzz like crazy?


Not all, but many. I always try to feel out their playing style b4 and give full disclosure. But yeah, not for everyone.

Either way, as long as I was shaving, I would take it down another .015 so that action would be possible.
Pat

_________________
Pat


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 30 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: DennisK and 71 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com