Official Luthiers Forum!

I've built several acoustic Guitars thus far and several different body thickness. What do you like building at as far as thickness . What do you think is the sweet spot. I generally build om size . Thoughts and please expand on this idea .

_________________
The Shallower the depth of the stream , The Louder the Babble !
The Taking Of Offense Is the Life Course Of The Stupid One !
Wanna Leave a Better Planet for our Kids? How about Working on BETTER KIDS for our Planet !
Forgiveness is the ability to accept an apology that you will probably NEVER GET
The truth will set you free , But FIRST, it will probably Piss you Off !
Creativity is allowing yourself to make Mistakes, Art is knowing which ones to Keep !
The Saddest thing anyone can do , is push a Loyal Person to the point that they Dont Care Anymore
Never met a STRONG person who had an EASY past !
http://wiksnwudwerks.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/groups/GatewayA ... rAssembly/

Without a scrap of finite analysis, my SWAG is that 'it depends'. On how the box likes to resonate at what frequency with what force, and that's a result of all the characteristics of the materials and construction stacking up, and whatever sympathetic happiness comes from the soundhole size. I'm willing to wager that the ideal volume for a given footprint varies as a function of everything else working at the same time.

_________________
Peter Havriluk

Your question reminded me of something Alan Carruth posted related to guitar body depth in an old thread about luthiere myths. I found it:

"Years ago Fred Dickens, a researcher as Bell Labs who built Classicals in his spare time, looked into the effect of body depth on sound. He made one that was about 6" deep, and cut it down an inch at a time until it was to shallow to work. He didn't tell me about any listening tests; he was more interested in influence on the 'main air' mode pitch. Going from 6" deep to around 2" raised the main air pitch by about 7%; a little more than a semitone. So much for 'a deeper body has a lower air mode'. I'd say this was a pretty valid test because hed was only looking for a limited amount of information, and the top, back, and neck, and the wood in the sides, was the same all through."

_________________
Once in a while you get shown the light in the strangest of places if you look at it right - Robert Hunter

I have had good luck making small bodied guitars somewhat deeper than they are generally made. No science behind it, just flying by the seat of my pants....

Some of the Nick Lucas L-bodied Gibsons pre-1930 were up to 5" thick compared to 3-3/4" of the regular instrument. You might look up opinions on the sound of the Nicks.

Here is John Thomas - author of Kalamazoo Gals and owner of a ton of vintage instruments - comparing a group of L-bodies, including a Nick:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VOKsdAFCCIw

Ed

I have a rose wood body that is in process at 5" thick

_________________
The Shallower the depth of the stream , The Louder the Babble !
The Taking Of Offense Is the Life Course Of The Stupid One !
Wanna Leave a Better Planet for our Kids? How about Working on BETTER KIDS for our Planet !
Forgiveness is the ability to accept an apology that you will probably NEVER GET
The truth will set you free , But FIRST, it will probably Piss you Off !
Creativity is allowing yourself to make Mistakes, Art is knowing which ones to Keep !
The Saddest thing anyone can do , is push a Loyal Person to the point that they Dont Care Anymore
Never met a STRONG person who had an EASY past !
http://wiksnwudwerks.blogspot.com/
http://www.facebook.com/groups/GatewayA ... rAssembly/

One thing to remember about building odd sized bodies is that you might not be able to find a case to fit. I built a couple of small but deep bodied 12 strings (000/OM bodies - 4-1/2 inches deep) and had to buy $300 custom cases to fit them.

edit to add, they are also somewhat more awkward to play.

Because of the long headstock?

Why?

_________________
Pat

Freeman wrote:
One thing to remember about building odd sized bodies is that you might not be able to find a case to fit. I built a couple of small but deep bodied 12 strings (000/OM bodies - 4-1/2 inches deep) and had to buy $300 custom cases to fit them.

Pat wrote:
Because of the long headstock?

Cases are not only made to fit the shape of the body but also the depth. Adding an extra inch in depth can make it hard to find a case that will close without pressing the bridge into the top. One reason I build "coffin cases" for some of my instruments is because I make them extra deep and a standard case won't work.

Freeman wrote:
edit to add, they are also somewhat more awkward to play.

Pat wrote:
Why?

If it is a fairly deep instrument to start with the extra inch of depth makes it that much more difficult to reach over. Some people are building with an "arm bevel" to make a more comfortable guitar. I think it was Mario who used to build what might be called a "thinline Dred" ( please correct me if I am wrong). Adding an inch to a Gibson L 1 pushes it to Dred depth, but adding an inch to a Dred pushes it out of the comfort zone.

The answer to the first question is that every about the guitar was wrong for a standard case - they were small bodies (000) but deep, plus they are very long scale (26.5) plus they have long headstocks. Cedar creek made nice custom cases.



I just wanted to raise that as a warning - if you build something a little bit odd ball it may not fit a standard case.

As far as the playability - again, I like small bodied guitars (single and double ought, OM) and I hate sitting down with a dread. A deep bodied guitar just doesn't sit as nicely on my lap, add the long scale of that 12 string and its a bit of a monster. Again, a minor point and we can adapt pretty easily but just something to think about.

I like to use a body thickness that is somewhat deeper than conventional. Martins OM is something like 4-1/8" at the end block and around 3-1/4" at the neck. For my slightly bigger SJ I use 4-3/4 and 3-3/4. My early SJ's were more Dread sized, 4-7/8" and 3-7/8". I scaled that down looking for a better fingerstyle sound. It has made some difference at least to my ear.

As Freeman has said, looking for a case that fits while still designing the guitar is a good idea. I did that with my new SJ. For my Jumbo model I use a custom Ameritec case. They are beauties.

_________________
Joe Beaver
Maker of Sawdust

I tend to build a bit shallower rather than deeper vs "standard" depths... I think I like the feel a bit better..