Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 11:49 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Compound Radius Boards
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 9:58 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Oct 16, 2012 6:20 pm
Posts: 19
First name: J
Last Name: Ebinly
When modeling a compound fretboard, there are two methods of doing so, and we don’t know which is correct.
Primary method – Create two arc lines, 12” and 16” radius, and place each at their respective fretboard ends, one at the top and the other at the bottom. That’s easy, but here’s the issue. How should those two lines be aligned to each other when viewing the arcs from the headstock? Should the top centers of the arcs be aligned, or should their edges be aligned? That’s the question.

If the tops are aligned, so that the fretboard will have the same thickness along its entire run, the edges will be of different thickness due to the fretboard’s compound radius.

If the arcs sides are aligned, so that the fretboard’s left and right edges will be of equal thickness, the fretboard’s center at the heal will be higher than that of the Nut, due to the heal radius being flatter.

So, which is correct?

Should a compound radius fretboard be of equal thickness, from top to bottom?
-Or-
Should it be thinner at the Net end, and thicker at the heal end?

Both are possible, depending on how you align the arcs during modeling.


Last edited by QueZee on Mon Oct 29, 2012 1:00 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Fri Oct 19, 2012 11:00 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jan 15, 2010 3:34 pm
Posts: 2047
First name: Stuart
Last Name: Gort
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Assuming you have enough adjustment at the bridge to cover both configurations it doesn't matter at all which you choose. With the arc apexes aligned the edge thickness difference at each end won't be much more than .02" and no one will visually see it.

The thing I'd worry about is being sure the radii used are appropriate to the taper you are using. If you haven't calculated the precise radii necessary then the result you achieve won't be as accurate as it could be. Since you're using CAD you might as well calculate and draw it perfectly. Maybe you did this but since you mentioned 12" and 14" (rounded off numbers) as the radii...well that sounds like you may be sort of guessing.

_________________
I read Emerson on the can. A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds...true...but a consistent reading of Emerson has its uses nevertheless.

StuMusic


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 10:08 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Thu Oct 27, 2011 11:28 am
Posts: 184
First name: Leonard
Last Name: Duke
City: Kalamazoo
State: MI
Zip/Postal Code: 49001
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Amateur
Since the fingerboard is usually a higher quality tonewood than the neck (because it has more effect on the tone than the neck) you want to remove the least wood possible from the specific fingerboard blank you are working with.
Think of all those great old acoustics with brazillion rosewood fingerboards and bridges.


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 3 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com