***** Guitar Project Jigs, Tools & Techniques Online Resources Archives OLF Video Page Library of plans MP3 Library Inlay Class
Offical Luthiers Forum





And our community proudly sponsored by:

RC Tonewoods | Stewart MacDonald | LuthiersForum
TasmanianTonewoods | OLF | OLF MERCH
Luthier Suppliers | Pacific Coast Woods | ELEVATE
OLF X | Tasmanian Acoustic Tonewood | Luthiers Forum Store!
Luthiers Forum | OLF Facebook | AVAIL SPACE
OLF | Alaska Specialty Woods | A.Hix Tonewood
Duke of Pearl | Birkonium CNC | Space




Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Tue Nov 26, 2024 9:51 pm


Board index » Forum Archive

All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 
  Print view Previous topic | Next topic 
Author Message
freddieb
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:59 pm 
Offline
Walnut
Walnut

Joined: Tue Nov 13, 2007 3:55 pm
Posts: 1
Can someone explain the physics behind making a guitar string vibrate at a certain pitch?

What are the factors?

These are the factors that I can think of . . .

1. length of string
2. tension on string

Bit of a vague question I know, but I thought I'd ask anyway . . .

Thanks,

Freddie
Top
 Profile  
 
Rick Turner
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Tue Nov 13, 2007 4:04 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
1) Unit density/weight measure

2) Length

3) Tension

Those three issues determine pitch...discounting string stiffness which moves harmonics sharper and sharper the higher up the harmonic series you go.


Google the D'Addario site. Great stuff there on tension gauge (unit density)
Top
 Profile  
 
Mike Mahar
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 12:54 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sun Jan 02, 2005 1:38 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Amherst, NH USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
More than you ever wanted to know about how strings behave is in a article by Al Carruth in the latest issue of the ASIA journal "Guitarmaker".



Top
 Profile  
 
Zach Ehley
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 3:51 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:47 am
Posts: 781
Location: Wauwatosa, WI, USA

Length, mass and tension.  For fellow enginerds who want to chug through some equations go to http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/waves/string.html.  Its a good simple explanation without requiring a masters in mechanical engineering to understand.  Also there is a cool simulator that allows you to see the motion of the string based on where you pluck it.  http://falstad.com/loadedstring/
Top
 Profile  
 
Parser
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 4:56 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Crownsville, MD
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Lewis
City: Crownsville
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21032
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
The factors listed above are the main ones.

One often overlooked (from an engineering perspective) aspect of this type of vibration is the end conditions. I used to work for a company that designed shafts & such for turbine equipment and the stiffness of the bearings supporting the shafts have a very large effect on the vibration characteristics. Most engineering calculations assume that the ends are infinitely stiff (i.e. a perfect theoretical situation).

So...for guitar strings that tells me that the break angles and relief at the nut and the bridge are also pretty critical.


_________________
http://www.PeakeGuitars.com
Top
 Profile  
 
Rick Turner
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:29 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
And most string engineering calculations assume the string to be infinitely flexible...which they're not. The lack of perfect flexibility at each end of the string (and in the string itself) is the basic reason for intonation compensation at the bridge.   The thicker strings are, the more they act as clamped bars, not one dimensional strings which is what all harmonic theory is based upon.
Top
 Profile  
 
Todd Rose
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 5:52 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 11, 2005 3:32 am
Posts: 2683
Location: Ithaca, New York, United States
Recommended book: Fundamentals of Musical Acoustics, by Arthur Benade.

_________________
Todd Rose
Ithaca, NY

https://www.dreamingrosesecobnb.com/todds-art-music

https://www.facebook.com/ToddRoseGuitars/
Top
 Profile  
 
Zach Ehley
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 6:54 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 10, 2007 2:47 am
Posts: 781
Location: Wauwatosa, WI, USA

When looking at vibration, engineering calculations are always wrong because they never take all variables into consideration.  We did finite analysis on a pump, a big big pump, which showed a natural frequency right at the operating speed.  We braced the heck out of the thing to move the resonance.  Low an behold it would have been fine in the first place and the bracing we did actually caused vibration contrary to the FEA.


Same with the string calculation.  There is no good standard for a guitar string model. Its not fixed or simply supported, but something in between.  Then the vibration will stretch the part of the string beyond the nut and saddle.  So its somewhat pointless to try to get it exact.  There are just too many variables to account for on a guitar to do a truly accurate calculation.  Follow the KISS rule.


The string is assumed to be infinitely flexible because if you ever exceed the yield stress, everything goes to pot in the calculations.  Unless you were refering to the flexability of the support point.
Top
 Profile  
 
Alan Carruth
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:04 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sat Jan 15, 2005 12:50 pm
Posts: 3929
Location: United States
As Mike said, I spent 'way too much time over the past three years or so measuring string vibrations, and figuring out what the h--- was going on. The conclusion I came to, in a nutshell, is that the usual physics book explanations are fine as far as they go, but all the _interesting_ stuff is in the non-linearities that require too much higher math for the usual beginner's books. That's why it took me so long: that level of math is beyond my skill and I wasn't expecting to see a lot of that stuff.

That said; yeah, you can calculate the fundamental pitch 'close enough' if you know the length, tension and mass per unit length. The partials will be progressively sharp if the string is on 'rigid' mounts; a solidbody guitar (but not a bass!) would be close enough for government work. Stings on guitars can do all sorts of weird things. and all of this assumes that the strings themselves are not too messed up; circular in cross section and so on.    
Top
 Profile  
 
Rick Turner
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:11 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
The other wild card is that the ends of the strings are not true nodes because of the coupling factors. Once you couple a moving string to a structure that moves, that structure starts acting like a non-linear function added to the string.   

Best to know the simple theory, and then know that all sorts of things interfere with that simplicity.
Top
 Profile  
 
Michael Dale Payne
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:32 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
[QUOTE=zehley]

When looking at vibration, engineering calculations are always wrong because they never take all variables into consideration.  .

[/QUOTE]

Being an engineer; Dependent on the exercises at hand, Failing to to take all applicable variance in to consideration would be a dereliction of the tack.

Now that said, there does come a point in time where you can continue to add variable that are not real world realistic.

If you are working with engineers that fail to take applicable variances into consideration then you need a new Engineering Manager.

30 some odd years in mecanicl engineering I have seen vary few cases where a part/structure failed because the engineer did not take know variances into consideration in their calculations. As an engineering product failure investigation team member almost every stress or catastrophic shock failure I have seen turned out to be product fabrication or usage errors.

The few times that I have seen engineering calculation errors to be directly linked to a failure it could be referred "bad info in= bad Calc's out syndrome" meaning where the data provided to the engineer was incorrect therefore the engineers calculation output is not up to snuff.

But I can say that engineers will look at all applicable variance when doing structural calculation. We take this stuff pretty seriously.
Top
 Profile  
 
Michael Dale Payne
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:34 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
Being an engineer; Dependent on the exercises at hand, Failing to to take all applicable variance in to consideration would be a dereliction of the tack.

Now that said, there does come a point in time where you can continue to add variable that are not real world realistic.

If you are working with engineers that fail to take applicable variances into consideration then you need a new Engineering Manager.

30 some odd years in mechanical engineering I have seen vary few cases where a part/structure failed because the engineer did not take know variances into consideration in their calculations. As an engineering product failure investigation team member almost every stress or catastrophic shock failure I have seen turned out to be product fabrication or usage errors.

The few times that I have seen engineering calculation errors to be directly linked to a failure it could be referred "bad info in= bad Calc's out syndrome" meaning where the data provided to the engineer was incorrect therefore the engineers calculation output is not up to snuff.

But I can say that engineers will look at all applicable variance when doing structural calculation. We take this stuff pretty seriously.
Top
 Profile  
 
Rick Turner
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:41 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
You can also spend so much time on over-engineering, studying, and documenting something like a guitar that you simply run out of money...   There is not a $5,000.00 engineering budget to spend on each $4,000.00 guitar...
Top
 Profile  
 
Michael Dale Payne
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 14, 2007 7:52 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian
Old Growth Brazilian

Joined: Tue Dec 28, 2004 1:56 am
Posts: 10707
Location: United States
been there done that not on guitars but on pumping units


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  Page 1 of 1
  [ 14 posts ] 

Board index » Forum Archive

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com