Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Nov 23, 2024 7:05 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Sun Nov 11, 2007 10:32 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 6:20 am
Posts: 1437
First name: Bob
Last Name: Johnson
City: Denver
State: CO.
Zip/Postal Code: 80224
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Is it becoming, or has it become, derreggure for Martins, etc to finish guitars with a "matte" finish. OK if that's what the customer wants but by its use may of the great color, figuring, and wood nuance is lost using this finish-not for me, please.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:29 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Sat Feb 12, 2005 6:20 am
Posts: 1437
First name: Bob
Last Name: Johnson
City: Denver
State: CO.
Zip/Postal Code: 80224
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks again Todd.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 12:33 am 
Offline
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
Old Growth Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Fri Nov 02, 2007 9:49 am
Posts: 13386
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
First name: Hesh
Last Name: Breakstone
City: Ann Arbor
State: Michigan
Country: United States
Status: Professional
It's been said here before that who ever decided that guitar finishes needed to shine should be dug up and shot.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 2:29 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 241
I have one client who requested a matte finish so that the guitar would not flare and reflect TV lighting (this wasn't just wishful thinking but a genuine need on his part). In general though Todd is right on in his assertion that it is a cheaper finish (read less labor intensive) than a high gloss lacquer finish. It is a major factor for instance in the plethora of lower priced Martin models which have appeared in the last ten years or so. Martin applies fewer coats of finish on these guitars as the partial fill of the surface is masked by the matte top coat. This is one of the reasons why I cringe when folks talk of buffing these out thinking they have created the equivalent of Martin's full gloss finish. 


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:46 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
I do a lot of satin finishes. I fill and shoot pretty much just as I would for a gloss finish, but level out the last coat of polyester with 320 and then shoot McFadden's satin urethane on it...one or two coats. Done...and it's a lot easier than doing a full buff.   On many of our Renaissance guitars, we'll gloss the top and satin the backs and sides. I do now go for a completely pore-filled look...not the look of an oil finish.

I satin all the Renaissance necks, and often gloss the face of the peghead.   The feel of the satin necks is really nice.

The key to satin is to strain your finish mix well so no lumps get through, and then to shoot in a clean atmosphere.

You can also do the open pored look of an oil finish, and you can do it over an oil sealer if you use Waterlox.

Some of my customers have asked for satin on very expensive instruments, and I have to say it can look very classy.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:49 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa

Joined: Wed Aug 24, 2005 11:13 am
Posts: 1398
Location: United States
With regard to Todd's comments...I do all the build with clear materials and then just shoot a very thin top coat or two that has the flatting agent. That way the finish has good transparency but a very even satin sheen. If you try to build with a satin coating, it does get less and less transparent.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:54 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sat Aug 25, 2007 12:59 pm
Posts: 241

Thanks Rick, straining the finish mix is an extremely important tip.


Nothing is worse than spraying that final coat (it has to be perfect too...) with the flatting agent and ending up with a chalky lump in the finish because it was not properly mixed and strained.   



Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Mon Nov 12, 2007 3:56 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 05, 2005 3:45 pm
Posts: 4337
Location: United States
One more consideration is that a matte top--well, one done via abrasives--becomes an issue in the recording studio. The extra friction there translates to hand noise or sleeve noise that one might not want on a recording. I would always recommend to a studio customer that the instrument needs at least a gloss top.

Steve

_________________
From Nacogdoches...the oldest town in Texas.

http://www.stephenkinnaird.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 11 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 33 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com