Official Luthiers Forum! http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
A couple of fret questions http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10137&t=48568 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | FL6 [ Sun Nov 20, 2016 9:16 pm ] |
Post subject: | A couple of fret questions |
As a newb there's 2 things I don't quite understand. Please forgive me for missing the obvious. 1.) Why do we use a precision ground flat bar to sand the frets flat? Shouldn't we be using the radius'd sanding block, the same one used to sand and radius the fretboard? It seems to me we're sanding the fretboard to a certain radius, then installing the frets to the same radius but then we sand the tops of the frets flat. Not to mention we also have to take into account the radius when setting up the bridge, pickups and nut. So we end up using 2 different tools...a radius sanding block yet a flat sanding beam? 2.) This pic shows every fret crowning job I ever done (just with my own guitars). This pic is taken from this video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yyLu0cr ... 923.809648 http://imgur.com/iyKlK1E What throws me off is why is the magick marker line so erratic? Shouldn't it be a perfectly straight line? To me this pic shows a fret that's flat in some spots, perfect in others, so-so in other spots. As a novice I would say this fret looks messed up and needs more precise filing. It throws me off because I don't know when the crown is good so I'm not sure about moving on to the next fret. I guess I'm asking what am I looking for with my eyes? I know from my limited experience that when you're done fine sanding and polishing it looks great but I want to make sure I'm perfectly crowning frets for ultimate performance. |
Author: | Hesh [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 6:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: A couple of fret questions |
Hey Paul: Your presumptions are not entirely accurate and that my friend is what's throwing you off in your understanding. Good on you for noticing this AND asking about it too. When you talk about what "we" do please be advised that we.... do not all do fret work the very same way. Nor do we all want a fixed radius on either our boards or our fret tops. A compound radius is desirable because it actually permits ever so slightly lower action and to many players, not all.... that's a desirable thing. The method that you are using, sanding the board to a fixed radius need not be done that way. You can use tube stock precision ground very flat to sand the board to a compound radius and then after installing the frets the very same technique can be used for level the fret tops. When we fret as I have described, and we do this every couple of days with our very busy multi-Luthier repair business we find that the amount of material that has to be removed from the fret tops is mouse nuts.... nearly nothing at all. Moving on the line that you see on your fret tops or what we call the "crown" should be fairly consistent, thin, unbroken, and without wide flats as we see in your picture. We like the fret crown to look like new fret wire prior to being installed and the methods for crowning, tools that could be used, etc. vary some too. From old school three corner files to newer diamond files great results can be achieved with a number of methods and tools. Most of all though I want to toss the severed head out there in folk's laps (Apocalypse Now fan, forgive me please..) that the better job we do on leveling the board and installing the frets with uniformity the less if any material we have to remove from the fret tops making the discussion of the "line" or marker line less important. Anyway fretting is a art. Most f*ctory instruments are distributed with "fair" fret work with a few exceptions that can be better or worse than the norm. Many Luthier built instruments can have anything from horrible.... fret work with loose frets, nothing close to a level set, and fret ends that might be better employed in that film 50 shades of grey..... Other Luthier built instruments can have fret work superior to the usual suspect f*ctory producers. Just depends on how much the individual builder cares about the fact that ultimately a guitar is a tool for a musician............ For acoustic instruments specifically for blue grass music where hit em hard and set em high is the norm for playing and set-up... the quality of the fret plane is not as important because of the higher action. Some of the worst fret work we've seen has been on these instruments. The best fret work that we see is typically on shredder guitars where super low action is both desirable and necessary for the playing technique. Low action is intolerant of lousy fret work. Fretting is an art as mentioned, we teach it and many OLFers have been to our shop to learn and you are welcome too. 2017 classes will be scheduled and posted in a month or two when we can see 2017 better from here. It's a two day class and we teach our students how to do superb fret work including for repair work, refrets, etc. as well as on new builds and we teach how to do superb set-ups too. Nut making, saddle compensation and much more. In our classes all of your questions would have been addressed in the normal material and then we dive deeper until you leave finding your self not only understanding how a guitar needs to work but perhaps even at times imagining that you are a guitar... That's my story and I'm sticking to it. If interested shoot me a PM. Great questions and observations on your part too. |
Author: | FL6 [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 11:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: A couple of fret questions |
Yeah sorry, I don't know why I used the term "we". I think because I keep reading the same techniques (roughly) being applied but I do know that everyone has their own way. Thanks for the awesome reply. I have something to go on now. |
Author: | Pmaj7 [ Mon Nov 21, 2016 3:11 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A couple of fret questions |
A long sanding beam is better because the string paths as a whole are actually conical and not cylindrical. So sanding a single path is more accurate. Also, it is easier and doesn't waste as much fret material. However, regarding the next point of uneven crown thickness, I think that stems from uneven fret height. That is where a three Corner file or a curved crowning file comes in handy. The parts where you have sanded all the ink off are going to be lower then the rest of your fret plane |
Author: | J De Rocher [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:24 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A couple of fret questions |
pat macaluso wrote: A long sanding beam is better because the string paths as a whole are actually conical and not cylindrical. So sanding a single path is more accurate. Also, it is easier and doesn't waste as much fret material. ( To help me understand why a long sanding beam would be better, are you talking about a constant radius fretboard or a compound radius fretboard? |
Author: | Pmaj7 [ Wed Nov 23, 2016 3:50 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: A couple of fret questions |
Well, for sure it's needed for a compound radius. But, I was thinking that if the frets were very worn on a constant radius board, you might have a little of that same action going on. The shortest path to even fret height might not exactly conform to the planned radius. Actually, the long beam is not relevant in this aspect. Just the single string path. You could use a radiused sanding bean, however you would unnecessarily lose fret height. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |