Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Mon Nov 25, 2024 10:59 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Fadal Control versions
PostPosted: Fri Aug 27, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 488
Anyone have guitar shop experience with some of the older Fadal Control versions like the CNC 88?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 12:08 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:46 am
Posts: 2968
Location: United States
I do, It's been a while though.

_________________
Jim Watts
http://jameswattsguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:05 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 488
The reason I ask is that from the research I've done it sounds like the CNC88HS controller is the one to go for, but my budget is more inline with machines of the CNC88 vintage. So no graphics, large files have to be fed via DNC. I don't mind the DNC but the graphics are kind of nice to varify position and file visually.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 11:55 am 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Crownsville, MD
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Lewis
City: Crownsville
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21032
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I think that is the type we used over at PRS. We also had a new one with the newer Fanuc style controller. Both work...no real issues with either one.

Trev

_________________
http://www.PeakeGuitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 1:34 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 12, 2005 5:46 am
Posts: 2968
Location: United States
The dnc works fine. Assuming your not going to MDI everything into the machine you should be able to verify your code on your programming system.
If the machine is not worn out, you should be a very happy camper.

_________________
Jim Watts
http://jameswattsguitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:21 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2351
Location: Canada
First name: Bob
Last Name: Garrish
City: Toronto
State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Status: Professional
I have an 88HS and FWIW, I've never used any of the graphics or built-in functions in four years. 180K of memory, though I have the chips here to put it to four hundred something, so I DNCed everything. I used the MDI once in awhile to drill some quick holes or face something off, but 99% of the time was DNCing a program or jogging the cutter around with the pulse wheel.

The various 88-series controllers are almost identical except for the graphics, the menus, and speed. I've never used the graphics or the menus, but speed can be an issue. As you go down in controller versions they get slower and slower. The 88 is at most a third the speed of the slowest HS which means you'll have to take it slow if you want really accurate cuts. This isn't usually an issue since most guitar builders with CNCs have them sitting 90% of the time, but would have been a huge issue for me.

Here's info on the control versions:
http://www.fadalvmcparts.com/fadal-cnc.html
http://www.fadalvmcparts.com/fadal-parts/1400_board.html

The controls are the real bottleneck on these machines; I'd consider it worth it to upgrade them. The difference even between different revisions of the 88HS can be pretty big if they're actually being fed at production speeds. You could always retrofit it later if the controller's getting you down.

_________________
Bob Garrish
Former Canonized Purveyor of Fine CNC Luthier Services


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 5:27 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2351
Location: Canada
First name: Bob
Last Name: Garrish
City: Toronto
State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Status: Professional
Also: try to get a '94 or later machine and verify that it has 'metric ballscrews'. They changed to bigger and better ballscrews in '94 (mine has them, it's a '94) but I'm not 100% sure they didn't release any machines with inch ballscrews in early '94 or somesuch. You can retrofit a control, and you can even replace the motors and sensors, but you're stuck with your ballscrews.

_________________
Bob Garrish
Former Canonized Purveyor of Fine CNC Luthier Services


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 9:34 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Mon Mar 03, 2008 6:51 pm
Posts: 488
Thanks for the input guys.

Bob, what do you mean by slow? On my current machine typical speed for accurate work is 40 "/min or less. The fastest we cut is 80 "/min.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sat Aug 28, 2010 10:19 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Tue May 02, 2006 9:02 am
Posts: 2351
Location: Canada
First name: Bob
Last Name: Garrish
City: Toronto
State: Ontario
Country: Canada
Status: Professional
So far as I know, any of them will do 250IPM. That's the inch ballscrew standard. The metric ballscrew machines are rated at 400IPM.

A 88HS (1400-4) is at least six times as fast as an 88, and it can profile accurately at 200IPM. That could be a function of the feedback loop as well, and of course the complexity of the motion. Of course 'accurate' is a relative term when you're talking about guitar parts, but the 88 was made in a day when something fully contoured like a guitar neck or bridge was expected to take hours.

_________________
Bob Garrish
Former Canonized Purveyor of Fine CNC Luthier Services


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Aug 29, 2010 8:55 pm 
Offline
Koa
Koa
User avatar

Joined: Tue Nov 28, 2006 1:44 pm
Posts: 1105
Location: Crownsville, MD
First name: Trevor
Last Name: Lewis
City: Crownsville
State: MD
Zip/Postal Code: 21032
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Hey Sheldon, Not sure how pressed you are to speed up production but you should be able to carve bodies & such upwards of 200 ipm with a 10 HP/10,000 rpm spindle (I'm assuming this is the one you have). Granted, you'll probably want to slow it down for things like neck pockets & other more precise work. Necks are typically run slower than a couple hundred ipm just because of the type of toolpath...the machine will knock pretty good at the end of each pass as it reverses direction when it goes this fast. With that said...you definitely need some good jigs to be able to handle the forces on the parts when taking off that much material that fast...!!

Trev

_________________
http://www.PeakeGuitars.com


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 10 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com