Official Luthiers Forum!
http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/

Wireless Instrument Transmitter/Receiver
http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=15001		 Page 1 of 1
Author:  Bruce Dickey [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:24 pm ]
Post subject: 
Anyone use these, 249 bucks, are they any good? Other recommendations? What about a hard-wired one in the guitar eliminating the external jack? Bruce TIA



Hard-wired sound with wireless freedom!
The AKG WMS 40 PRO Wireless Guitar System dispenses with the bodypack transmitters and cables entirely. It uses the ultra-miniature Guitarbug UHF transmitter that is nearly weightless, almost invisible, and plugs directly into your instrument's output jack. Its FlexJack extendable plug ensures perfect compatibility with any guitar output jack, surface-mounted or recessed.

The best thing about the WMS 40 PRO/Guitarbug system is its sound. It delivers all the highs, lows, and transient attack of your instrument so your audience hears all the nuances of your playing. With its ultra-wide frequency response and wide dynamic range, it sounds and feels just like a hard-wired system. Operates up to 11 hours on a single AAA alkaline battery; 6 hours on a rechargeable batteries. The all-metal WMS 40 PRO receiver is rugged and roadworthy and rackmounts singly or side-by-side with the optional RMU40 kit. Comes backed by a 2-year parts and labor warranty from AKG.

AKG WMS 40 PRO/Guitarbug UHF Wireless Guitar System Features:
Author:  L. Presnall [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:56 pm ]
Post subject: 
Our praise team uses them Bruce...they're great! Our leader got one, and so I bought one a while later...liked it so much I bought our acoustic player one and he bought our bass guy one! Look on eBay for boyntonproaudio...he's selling them new in the box for $149...great guy to work with!
Author:  John Elshaw [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 1:58 pm ]
Post subject: 
Hi Bruce,

I used to have a NADY version when I was playing in bands regularly and I must say they are great when working properly. They eat a lot of batteries and probably won't last near the 11 hours advertised. Once in awhile we'd get some interference but I'm guessing the newer ones have more frequencies to choose from and fewer problems. There was always a slight delay that bothered me but again, these newer ones may have solved that problem. If you need to be free and cordless on the stage, I think they're a good option. If cables are an option, I would use those first unless there was a good reason for not being able to use them.

Cheers!

John
Author:  James Orr [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 2:37 pm ]
Post subject: 
Hey Bruce

Can you say more about why you'd like to have a wireless system?

Though I've never tried it with a wireless, I plugged a Monster Cable
straight into my recording interface, recorded a clip, and did the same
with a sample of higher quality cable from lavacable.com. The difference
was night and day---and unfortunately proved me wrong that cable
doesn't make a difference. So I picked up a couple Sommer Spirit's from
Lava. The price was reasonable enough without getting into the
ridiculous realm. I've never tried it with wireless, but I wonder how
degraded the sound would be if even Monster Cable makes it all muddy.

I ask you to say more about why you want one because the guitar player
at church uses a wireless to make up the whopping five feet between him
and the amp he plops in front of my bass drum (I'm the sunday morning
drummer). He thinks it's fun to walk down the aisle during rehearsal, but
it feeds back all the time and interferes with the wireless lapels the
pastors wear.       

I would make sure you can return whichever system you use after testing
it out, just in case it doesn't meet your satisfaction.

Sorry, I'm trying to be less dry, but every time I think about the amp
RIGHT in front of my bass drum (a foot away), I get irritated
Author:  L. Presnall [ Sun Dec 16, 2007 3:30 pm ]
Post subject: 
I think it all depends on the application...our church is very energetic and cables get in the way...it's funny...I loved the old belt-pack NADY I had in the band days of 79-84...it was inefficient, noisy, full of "dead spot" issues, but it was wireless so it was COOL! The guitar bug has not given us one problem so far...and the battery life seems pretty good...we replace them before they completely die, but I'd say 9 hrs. is not out of the question...don't know about the 11 advertised tho...
Author:  Bruce Dickey [ Mon Dec 17, 2007 12:53 am ]
Post subject: 
James, yeah the reason: The Cool Factor for sure.

Cordless Mics are a mainstay now for any presenter.

I went to a concert and the friend Andy, playing his Tele, sported one of these.

Changing the subject to the cables Monster vs. Lava, that was pretty interesting. You wouldn't think there would be that much difference.

I like to shop on Amazon.com because of all the feedback ratings. It helps a novice be guided toward good product. This GuitarBug got a 88.5% Rating, which is excellent. A cheaper version and different brand only garnered 60%.

The wife wasn't interested in coughing up the 249 for one of these, while the $49 one was in her price range. We skipped both and went with a triple Mic Behringer pack with cables. Ratings were wonderful for those.
Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 5 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/