| Official Luthiers Forum! http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/ |
|
| alternative neck woods http://mowrystrings.luthiersforum.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=10102&t=14342 |
Page 1 of 2 |
| Author: | joelThompson [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 6:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Hi folks, I know this subject has been brought up many times in the past i am realy getting to a point where i have to come up with some viable alternatives to mahogany. With mahogany being upgraded to cites list 2 it realy becoming obvoise that we need to find more viable neck woods. even though we will still be able to get fsc plantation stock we are going to see the quality fall dramaticaly over the next couple of years. we are also going to lose cederella soon as well to the same fate as mahogany. I know that some electric builders are using rosewwods which i am full agreement with but what about acoustics. i do cut indian rosewood neck blanks for acoustics and when a/bed against some denser brazilian mahogany the rosewood is lighter so why not. sonokling is reasonably priced aswell but not as stable as old growth wood but it is lighter than old growth. Another exotic wood i thought might be viable was cylon satin wood. It is reasonbly priced very stable and quite light but at the same time having increadable density. The only problem i can see is A, is it strong enough and B, it tends to check. But sapele has the same problem and that is being used for necks. we have the other mahoganys but african can be very poor and unstable at times and seple can be brittle and prone to checking. I have notices that some companys are using shedua these days this is a wood i have no experience with so would have no idea. macasar ebony makes wonderfull electric necks but would be too heavy for an acoustic. what about utile/sipo i have a board here that is stunning and rings like a bell when wrapped. its also very cheap would this wood be an option. also i was wondering about all the plain koa and tas blackwood that is out there. I think that it would be a prime target for necks? There must some great woods out there that are perfect that are just waiting to be tried its just finding them thats the trouble. If anyone has any ideas on this i would love to hear you coments as i realy do have to find an alternative becouse its getting harder and harder to find mahogany here in the uk and we can no longer get it from the states thanks for listening, joel |
|
| Author: | Shawn [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 8:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
There are a number of wood that make good necks. Among Aussie woods, Queensland Maple and Alpine Ash are both good woods. I also get Monterey Cypress from Australia that is also a very nice neck wood. Walnut is a very good alternative for mahogany as it is stable, easy to work and looks good. Spanish Cedar is being used by Martin and others as an alternative but it too will soon become threatened and sources are getting scarcer for it in good quality. There are a number of Central and South American hardwoods that are in the same weight and density as Mahogany but have not been harvested commercially and are usually used as a secondary wood in US furniture plants where it is stained and finished to look like mahogany or walnut. The problem is not a lack of alternative woods, it is about adjusting expectations as to the choice of materials. FOr years classical guitar builders would build with nothing other than Brazilian Rosewood until that was out of reach pricewise or unavailable because of dwindling supply and CITES. Now a EIR back and side for a classical is accepted and the norm. The same will eventually be true of other woods instead of mahogany. |
|
| Author: | Jim Kirby [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cherry. |
|
| Author: | JohnAbercrombie [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:12 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
Joel- You certainly laid out a good long list of alternatives- some for me to try- thanks! I'll second Jim's suggestion about cherry- it makes a great neck- good-looking, and gets better with age, and doesn't look grubby after use if finished with oil (unlike maple). No pores, either. I've made a couple of steel-string guitars with cherry necks and I like the results. It's also relatively cheap in N. America. I'd think it might be a bit heavy for classicals, but perhaps if one was building a classical body that was heavy anyway, it would be an interesting experiment. Walnut is on my list to try on a classical some day- it looks good and isn't too dense. Thanks again. Cheers John |
|
| Author: | Steve Walden [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 1:39 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
I don't know if I look good, but I know I'm a little dense. Straight, quartered, light and stable. Right? Laminated necks seem the way to go. I realize that the aesthetics may not be there for some but as we get smaller dimensioned lumber from newer growth trees raised in sustainable forests, these may be our only alternatives. |
|
| Author: | Colin S [ Fri Nov 02, 2007 10:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
For steel string acoustics cherry is my favourite neck wood, and I am known for my love of mahogany, but cherry is my choice for necks now. As I'm in the UK I use our native Bird Cherry, Prunus avens, but it is virtually identical to P serotina in the USA. Ash is another wood that has ben used with great success. I know that John Kinnaird here on the forum has used it, and if it's good enough for John then it's good enough for me or indeed anyone. I think there are a lot of wood out there that will do the job, just that we have been stuck in a rut as mahogany was a cheap available timber that did the job well. Colin |
|
| Author: | Ben Furman [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:07 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Is limba really that bad as far as stability is concerned? How about canarywood? If the issue is just cost/availability, then lamination does seem to be the way to go. I'm glad to see people rally behind cherry. It seems to be a natural alternative. It has about the same density as a soft (e.g. bigleaf) maple but is stiffer. Downside is the occasional resin pocket. Keep an eye on whatever Samick and Cort are using these days, since they manage to crank out thousands upon thousands of guitars every year. Some of the "mahogany" comes from Indonesia, but I don't know what the species is. -Ben |
|
| Author: | David Collins [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Cherry. Frankly, I'm a bit surprised mahogany every became a universal standard in the US when we have cherry right here. |
|
| Author: | Ken Franklin [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:29 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I recently made a neck with Peruvian walnut that was stiff and lighter weight than our black walnut. It's a nice vintage chocolate brown, too. |
|
| Author: | Ben Furman [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 3:50 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Ken Franklin]I recently made a neck with Peruvian walnut that was stiff and lighter weight than our black walnut. It's a nice vintage chocolate brown, too.[/QUOTE] Ken, sorry for the off-topic response, but I just looked at your site, and I really like your "Madeline" body style. Just lovely. -Ben |
|
| Author: | Mike Collins [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:15 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I love Cherry also. I sometimes laminate it with curly soft maple (to make it easier to carve) I think any stable wood with properties close to Cherry & Mahogany -which have vertually the same strength to weight ratios -will work. Red cedar is available in lumber yards in huge pieces and would be a great classical & Flamenco neck. With the right reinforcement maybe a steel neck also! In the Northeast we have many hardwoods available-Oak-white & red,Beech,Ash,maples,Cherry,Birch,Walnut,even Elm! I think we as guitarmakers should use our native woods more. Just get some pieces of local woods -let them dry & try them on a guitar for yourself and record any changes in the woods -good or bad. 
Mike Collins www.collinsguitars.com |
|
| Author: | Arnt Rian [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 6:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Some 'old standards' are maple, birch and beech. I have also used ash and can second Colin's recommendation for it. These are all heavier than mahogany, so light tuners and a simple compression rod (for steel string guitars) is probably a good idea. |
|
| Author: | Chas Freeborn [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:47 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
At Healdsburg Ken Parker showed his very innovative archtop that had a composite neck with a Doug Fir core. Yes, Fir. I have built lots of furniture with old growth re-claimed Fir and I can say that the tight ringed old stuff is pound for pound at least as stiff and stable as HM. One day I may give it a go as an experiment. -C |
|
| Author: | Chas Freeborn [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:49 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
At Healdsburg Ken Parker showed his very innovative archtop that had a composite neck with a Doug Fir core. Yes, Fir. I have built lots of furniture with old growth re-claimed Fir and I can say that the tight ringed old stuff is pound for pound at least as stiff and stable as HM. One day I may give it a go as an experiment. At my recent stop at the wood store the 12/4 HM was gone with no re-order in sight. Short term alternatives are Khaya ("African Mahogany") and Sapele. -C |
|
| Author: | Ben Furman [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 7:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Chas Freeborn]At Healdsburg Ken Parker showed his very innovative archtop that had a composite neck with a Doug Fir core. Yes, Fir. I have built lots of furniture with old growth re-claimed Fir and I can say that the tight ringed old stuff is pound for pound at least as stiff and stable as HM. One day I may give it a go as an experiment. -C[/QUOTE] Check the thread on damping. I mention my fir-necked electrics there. There's no reason whatsoever not to give it a go.  -Ben |
|
| Author: | Jamie M [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:30 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Butternut (juglans cinerea)... I am just completing a guitar that I used it for and it looks great. It was quartersawn and when I compared the neck blank to an equal sized mahogany neck blank, the butternut was lighter; and to my untrained eye, it looks very similar to mahogany once carved (save the color of course). Also, the builder I'm working with (30+ years experience) has used it frequently for many years and believes it to be an equally as good neck wood. Once I figure out how to post pictures, I'll put some up of the neck. Jamie |
|
| Author: | Arnt Rian [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 9:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=Jamie M] Once I figure out how to post pictures, I'll put some up of the neck. [/QUOTE] Just click the icon on the far right over the posting dialogue box (it has a tree with an arrow on it), and another dialogue box appears that lets you browse your computer to upload a picture. |
|
| Author: | martinedwards [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:18 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I used oak once......... yeuch!!! once the chisel caught under the grain it lifted out in BIG splinters. I'll not be using it again in a hurry!! I've used walnut, maple, and EIR in lams...... |
|
| Author: | KenH [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 10:55 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
I just bought a pallet load of west coast cherry to be used for neck blanks. As soon as my current supply of mahogany runs out I will start using the cherry.... maybe before that. I have also bought a pallet load of northern ash to be used for necks. I have also bought myself a CNC router. I havent had time to play with it much, but my plans are to crank out rough carved cherry necks and ash necks as time permits. Perhaps by the next swap meet I'll have enough to let a few of them go. At this point I dont know if the CNC is the way to go or if a duplicator would be better. Either way, I am making the move away from mahogany for necks. |
|
| Author: | joelThompson [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 11:11 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Thanks for the answers folks. I also think that oak would be naty its horably open graind and has a tendancy to twist (i am thinking english oak here) With lamanting though we can use wood that we would not normaly use as long as we have a nice quarter sawn fillet of a good stable wood such as an ebony or rosewood or even snakewood (mmm!). chery is a wood that i have had good reports of and being in the uk its one of our native woods so thats a one wood i will be offering in the future. All though for some reason its agot a reputation as a bit of a boring wood Oh well thanks again for the comments folks any ideas let me know, Joel. |
|
| Author: | FishtownMike [ Sat Nov 03, 2007 5:24 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
[QUOTE=martinedwards] I used oak once......... yeuch!!! once the chisel caught under the grain it lifted out in BIG splinters. I'll not be using it again in a hurry!! I've used walnut, maple, and EIR in lams......[/QUOTE] Thanks for the warning on oak. I was giving it a thought. |
|
| Author: | Dean [ Sun Nov 04, 2007 8:27 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
For those of you that like HM, the root stock that was taken to Figi about 80 years ago is coming on line. The mill is set up and some is being shipped. I received a small bundle to use and I find no difference in quality. NO CITES needed. Grading has been a problem, due to lack of knowledge, but a US grading master has been hired and is on his way. DEan |
|
| Author: | Greenman [ Sun Nov 04, 2007 12:51 pm ] |
| Post subject: | |
 I think wood choice comes down to traditions sometimes rather than it's qualities. I was talking to a friend today about why the furniture made in Williamsburg was made with Mahogany when you had so many great native woods. One reason they only had hand tools and Mahogany was easy to work. Today with modern tools we can use much harder to work woods. Cherry and Maple can be tough to work with hand tools. I think Walnut would work well if you had the right piece. Butternut is softer but I think it would be difficult to get suitable wood. New England has some nice butternut trees. I resawed a back set for practice and it looks nice I don't know how good it would be for this? I agree that we need to think of alternatives and it would be great if we could use native woods as much as possible. I have heard good things about Canary wood but it is imported and expensive.
|
|
| Author: | joelThompson [ Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:40 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
My local supplier had a load of figi plantation mahogany recently an it was awfull. wide graind unstable course grained prone to checking you name it it was foul stuff i for one will not be using it. but i suppose its like brazilian and depends on soil content etc and i am sure there will be some nice stuff coming through. The indonision plantation stuff can be ok but i think we will all agree that plantation wood dont quite cut the mustard like good old old growth forest wood. As for the use of butternut i like the idea but never having worked with it i would no know. i would like to try it. what about oregon myrtle its simalar to maple yes so that should be an option. Thanks for the input you have all given me lots of options i just need to build another 15 guitars to test them all. Joel. |
|
| Author: | Rick Turner [ Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:51 am ] |
| Post subject: | |
Another vote here for laminated necks, and then for cherry and walnut. I've used cherry as a substitute for maple on electric necks, and it's just beautiful. It's also stable, machines well, and takes finish beautifully. |
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are UTC - 5 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group http://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
