Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Sat Nov 30, 2024 12:39 am


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Mar 26, 2019 5:44 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5498
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Anyone who's successfully used Macassar Ebony for B & S- what sort of thickness did/would you use?
If I target a similar weight as my "normal" EIR back thickness it would be ~ 1.975 mm or 0.78".
Too thin? OK?


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 27, 2019 9:31 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2257
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
I did an om with macassar ebony and I think the back ended up at close to .07. It just felt too heavy when it was thicker. Still plenty stiff.

Sent from my SM-N910T using Tapatalk

_________________
Pat



These users thanked the author Pmaj7 for the post: Colin North (Wed Mar 27, 2019 11:07 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:15 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Sun Mar 30, 2008 8:20 am
Posts: 5968
Personally I would leave the back thicker and go for a "reflective" back rather than a "responsive" one. I think the dense less oily woods (ebonys, ziricote, etc) are more brittle and crack prone when worked too thin. That is my impression,from the limited amount I have worked with them, others may know better.



These users thanked the author Clay S. for the post: Colin North (Sun Mar 31, 2019 8:21 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 11:57 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 02, 2013 8:16 am
Posts: 486
First name: Brian
City: U.P.
State: Michigan
Focus: Build
I have a macassar guitar going right now. I got several back sets 5 or 6 years ago and they were all on the thin side and this one was the worst with an area around 0.07" that I massaged into the waist as best I could. Sanded thickness was around 0.075, with one small area near a waist that had to be hand sanded to almost 0.065. A bit thinner than I would have preferred. But I really wanted to build with the macassar so figured the worst back set I had was a good place to start. This being only my 6th guitar and one of a group of 3 I'm working on at the same time. This one has been a closed box for a year now and seems plenty solid and I'm not worried about back strength.

My experience with macassar is that it is pretty tough stuff and seems less likely to split than most other guitar wood. I would probably shoot for back thickness of 0.08 to 0.085 but at 0.075 it seems quite OK. I really like macassar to work with.

Attachment:
DSCN1290.JPG


Brian R


You do not have the required permissions to view the files attached to this post.

_________________
Brian R, Wood Mechanic
N8ZED



These users thanked the author rbuddy for the post: Colin North (Sun Mar 31, 2019 2:36 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Mar 31, 2019 2:37 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 10, 2009 4:44 am
Posts: 5498
First name: colin
Last Name: north
Country: Scotland.
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Nice looking build Brian!

_________________
The name catgut is confusing. There are two explanations for the mix up.

Catgut is an abbreviation of the word cattle gut. Gut strings are made from sheep or goat intestines, in the past even from horse, mule or donkey intestines.

Otherwise it could be from the word kitgut or kitstring. Kit meant fiddle, not kitten.



These users thanked the author Colin North for the post: rbuddy (Sun Mar 31, 2019 3:27 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:11 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 08, 2010 12:17 am
Posts: 1286
First name: John
Last Name: Arnold
City: Newport
State: TN
Zip/Postal Code: 37821
Country: USA
Focus: Repair
Status: Professional
I would go with 0.075".

_________________
John



These users thanked the author John Arnold for the post: Colin North (Mon Apr 01, 2019 12:14 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 77 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com