Official Luthiers Forum!

Owned and operated by Lance Kragenbrink
It is currently Wed Dec 04, 2024 9:35 pm


All times are UTC - 5 hours


Forum rules


Be nice, no cussin and enjoy!




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 6:54 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3612
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Hello,

I use one of the old style LMI binding cutters. It's the tower on drawer slides, pretty basic. It's got a Porter Cable router in it and I was thinking of replacing the router with a Dewalt 611 so I can more easily adjust the depth. The PC has a mounting base with a thumb screw that allows you to change the depth. Suuuuuper precise. ;)

Anyway, while doing some looking at what else is out there I saw that LMI has an upgraded model and a new carrier.

Does anyone have the new model and do you like it? The rub plate allows you to change the depth and it supports a Bosch Colt, so maybe I can put that friggin router to use. :)

I could just mod the one I have to take the 611 and order one of their new fancy carriers.

Brad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars



These users thanked the author bcombs510 for the post: Darren Perry (Sun Mar 12, 2017 10:07 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Fri Mar 03, 2017 11:29 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 01, 2011 2:14 pm
Posts: 268
Location: Creedmoor, NC
First name: Tim
Last Name: Benware
City: Creedmoor
State: NC
Zip/Postal Code: 27522
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Professional
I just bought the new one a couple weeks ago, used it twice so far and I love it (adjusts so much more precise). I had the old tower type like you mentioned.

_________________
"I've been had again"
Tim Benware
Creedmoor, NC



These users thanked the author Ben-Had for the post: bcombs510 (Sat Mar 04, 2017 7:10 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:25 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
I had the old style and it worked well, but the new style is much better. Although the old style is very functional, I don't regret having spent the money to upgrade. Very precise depth of cut easily achieved with the threaded doughnut, and the counterweight spring keeps your soft tops from being scratched or dented as easily by the weight of the router when in use.
Mike


bcombs510 wrote:
Hello,

I use one of the old style LMI binding cutters. It's the tower on drawer slides, pretty basic. It's got a Porter Cable router in it and I was thinking of replacing the router with a Dewalt 611 so I can more easily adjust the depth. The PC has a mounting base with a thumb screw that allows you to change the depth. Suuuuuper precise. ;)

Anyway, while doing some looking at what else is out there I saw that LMI has an upgraded model and a new carrier.

Does anyone have the new model and do you like it? The rub plate allows you to change the depth and it supports a Bosch Colt, so maybe I can put that friggin router to use. :)

I could just mod the one I have to take the 611 and order one of their new fancy carriers.

Brad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



These users thanked the author Imbler for the post: bcombs510 (Sat Mar 04, 2017 4:26 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 8:45 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 3078
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm a very happy user of the current LMI binding ledge cutting system. The screwed on plastic donut is a great feature; it really helps you sneak up on the perfect vertical depth of cut. Also, I think the body carriage is a very smart design. When you combine this with a rabbeting bit and the right sized bearings, and the right cutting sequence (very important), there are very few things that are likely to go wrong.



These users thanked the author doncaparker for the post: bcombs510 (Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:05 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 12:25 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Fri Jun 04, 2010 10:02 pm
Posts: 313
First name: Michael
Last Name: Giltzow
City: Boise
State: Idaho
Zip/Postal Code: 83709
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
Hi Brad

I have used the LMI cutter for my last 5 guitars. I am very happy with it. I use the Bosch Colt - Mike G

_________________
guitarsbygiltzow.com



These users thanked the author giltzow for the post: bcombs510 (Mon Mar 06, 2017 12:34 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 3:45 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4805
I had it as well before moving on from the tower style jig to a Kett jig. The binding jig was fantastic, but I hated the cradle. I really liked the way the guitar slid into the cutter as opposed to the more acutely stepped donut I had on the jig I used prior to it, and I also thought the router moved up and down incredibly smoothly. If I wanted to go tower again, it would be my choice.



These users thanked the author James Orr for the post (total 2): nathanpeirson (Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:06 am) • bcombs510 (Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:40 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 4:43 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3612
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
James Orr wrote:
I had it as well before moving on from the tower style jig to a Kett jig. The binding jig was fantastic, but I hated the cradle. I really liked the way the guitar slid into the cutter as opposed to the more acutely stepped donut I had on the jig I used prior to it, and I also thought the router moved up and down incredibly smoothly. If I wanted to go tower again, it would be my choice.


Did you buy Ensor's Kett jig, the one from CanadianLuthierSupply, or...? I've got one from Chris on the way to give it a try. My main thing is flexibility to accommodate both Uke's and Guitars and consistent results. I like the LMI jig I have now but I do get some slight variance in the channel width. It's more noticeable in Uke's for whatever reason.

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars



These users thanked the author bcombs510 for the post: nathanpeirson (Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:06 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:02 pm 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 15, 2006 7:37 am
Posts: 4805
I have the Canadian Luthier Supply, but Chris' looks awesome and I'd love to try it. I just don't know if it's worth selling mine to do. My Kett jig from Josh is absolutely my favorite method to date.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



These users thanked the author James Orr for the post: bcombs510 (Mon Mar 06, 2017 10:11 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 4:55 pm 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3612
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I'm pretty much committed to moving back to a tower cutter at this point. I've tried the LuthierTool and Ensor jigs. Both have pluses and minuses, but the biggest drawback for me is control of the workpiece.

The reason I started investigating alternatives to the tower approach was issues I was having with getting a consistent channel depth, especially on Ukes. I believe this is due to the sides not being square combined with the radius on the front and back, is that correct? Any tips on how to avoid this? I use spreader jacks when gluing the back and top on, but the top is glued with a set of spreader jacks that are much smaller, only making contact with the widest parts of the upper and lower bout. Should I maybe spend some time making cauls that can fit through the soundhole and offer better contact while gluing the top? Other ideas?

Thanks!
Brad


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Wed Aug 09, 2017 6:14 pm 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
Some of the instructions on how to set up your carriage are incorrect in my opinion and lead to the problem you describe.

For cutting both the top and the back, the sides need to be normal to the board the carriage moves on.

So for a flat top guitar/uke for example where the sides are built square to the flat top, the top should be parallel to the board the carriage glides on both when cutting the top -and- the back.

I've seen instructions that tell you to adjust the carriage so that the back is parallel to the table when cutting the back channels, but that makes the sides skewed and depth of cut varies as the bearing is indexing off a skewed side.

Might or might not be your problem, but something to consider,

Mike



These users thanked the author Imbler for the post: bcombs510 (Wed Aug 09, 2017 8:51 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 7:01 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3612
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Thanks, Mike. I'm using 30' radius top and 15' radius back. Like you said, I've always measured the four "corners" of the body to make sure they are the same height from the base of the carrier (or from the workbench top).

Instead, you are saying to make the gap between the top and the base of the carrier the same distance all around when doing the back? This will make the surface of the back appear not to be "level" but will keep the sides more square to the bearing. Is that correct?

Appreciate the feedback!

Brad




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 7:59 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member

Joined: Tue Dec 17, 2013 10:52 pm
Posts: 3078
First name: Don
Last Name: Parker
City: Charleston
State: West Virginia
Zip/Postal Code: 25314
Country: USA
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
I think the trick is to make sure the sides of the body are completely vertical, 90 degrees from the bench top. If you use a short square to adjust the body toward that goal, the design of the rest of the system should handle any other irregularities in the body shape, slope of the back, all that stuff.



These users thanked the author doncaparker for the post: bcombs510 (Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:13 am)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 8:14 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 27, 2015 8:21 am
Posts: 3612
First name: Brad
Last Name: Combs
Focus: Build
Status: Amateur
Ok, thanks. I'll grab the new LMI rig here soon and give this a try. Thanks for the help!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

_________________
Insta - https://www.instagram.com/cbcguitars/
Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/cbcguitars


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 9:37 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
You've got it Brad! I'll bet that fixes your problem. Yes, the back will not be level, but the sides will be square to the bearing. And the rounded nub the router rides on keeps the unlevel back from noticeably affecting depth of cut.

This is assuming you use a radiused top glued to straight sides. If you radius the sides for the top, then the gap between the top and base can't be constant all the way around due to the curve sanded into the sides. In that case get the top gap to base of carrier as constant as the geometry allows, and then check the sides with a square to the base. If square your are good to go, if not make the small adjustment necessary to make sure the sides are square to the base.


bcombs510 wrote:
Thanks, Mike. I'm using 30' radius top and 15' radius back. Like you said, I've always measured the four "corners" of the body to make sure they are the same height from the base of the carrier (or from the workbench top).

Instead, you are saying to make the gap between the top and the base of the carrier the same distance all around when doing the back? This will make the surface of the back appear not to be "level" but will keep the sides more square to the bearing. Is that correct?

Appreciate the feedback!

Brad




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk



These users thanked the author Imbler for the post: bcombs510 (Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:49 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 10:36 am 
Offline
Contributing Member
Contributing Member
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 31, 2009 8:50 pm
Posts: 2257
Location: Seattle WA
Focus: Build
Status: Semi-pro
The correct way to use these is to make sure the sides are square to the platform. I've never heard of anyone trying to make sure the top or back was parallel to the platform. I guess the only way that would work is if the top was literally flat. But, in that case why would you need a binding machine?

Even when doing it the correct way, I notice about a 20 thou depth reduction in the rabbet in the upper bout of the back due to the geometry caused by the tapering. Others have said the same thing and I don't know of any way to avoid this without fixing it by hand somehow. This is on guitars. I haven't noticed the phenomenon happening on ukuleles. It's not much, and probably only luthiers would notice it.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk

_________________
Pat



These users thanked the author Pmaj7 for the post: bcombs510 (Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:49 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:04 am 
Offline
Cocobolo
Cocobolo

Joined: Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:14 pm
Posts: 439
First name: Mike
Last Name: Imbler
City: Wichita
State: KS
Zip/Postal Code: 67204
Country: usa
Focus: Build
pat macaluso wrote:
The correct way to use these is to make sure the sides are square to the platform. I've never heard of anyone trying to make sure the top or back was parallel to the platform. I guess the only way that would work is if the top was literally flat. But, in that case why would you need a binding machine?

Even when doing it the correct way, I notice about a 20 thou depth reduction in the rabbet in the upper bout of the back due to the geometry caused by the tapering. Others have said the same thing and I don't know of any way to avoid this without fixing it by hand somehow. This is on guitars. I haven't noticed the phenomenon happening on ukuleles. It's not much, and probably only luthiers would notice it.

Sent from my SM-G930T using Tapatalk


Most classicals are built on flat rims on the top side even though they have radiused tops. Therefore, when the top is parallel to the base of the carriage, the sides are square, and it is easier to measure distance to the top than jockey things around to get the sides square.
Both methods can be used to get the sides square. I just find it quite a bit simpler to keep an equidistant space between top and base of carriage.



These users thanked the author Imbler for the post: bcombs510 (Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:49 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Re: LMI Binding cutter
PostPosted: Thu Aug 10, 2017 11:20 am 
Offline
Brazilian Rosewood
Brazilian Rosewood

Joined: Fri Dec 14, 2007 3:21 pm
Posts: 3391
Location: Alexandria MN
For the jigs that use a tower and sled I put a right angle on the table and set the sled so the sides are parallel. Set the tower so the router bit is also parallel, and move the guitar around and make sure the bit is parallel to the cutting surface of the guitar side. There is always a little compromise.

That's about the best you can do. The upper bout of the back will always be slightly off in height but not bad if your doughnut has a small contact footprint.

_________________
It's not what you don't know that hurts you, it's what you do know that's wrong.



These users thanked the author Terence Kennedy for the post: bcombs510 (Thu Aug 10, 2017 5:49 pm)
Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 17 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 5 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: wade lucas and 60 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
phpBB customization services by 2by2host.com